In re the Estate of Uhl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Estate of Uhl

31 A.D.3d 1107, 816 N.Y.S.2d 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 2006

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.3d 1107 (In re the Estate of Uhl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Uhl, 31 A.D.3d 1107, 816 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, S.), entered April 7, 2005. The order provided that respondents Sally Himmelsbach and Lora Elkins are not entitled to inherit from Mildred E. Uhl, respondents Marian (Decker) Richards, William E. Decker, Phyllis Jean (Decker) Anderson and George Craig Decker, Jr. are entitled to 50% of the net distributable estate of Mildred E. Uhl and the New York State Comptroller is entitled to the remaining 50%.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, S.), entered April 7, 2005. The order provided that respondents Sally Himmelsbach and Lora Elkins are not entitled to inherit from Mildred E. Uhl, respondents Marian (Decker) Richards, William E. Decker, Phyllis Jean (Decker) Anderson and George Craig Decker, Jr. are entitled to 50% of the net distributable estate of Mildred E. Uhl and the New York State Comptroller is entitled to the remaining 50%.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 1107, 816 N.Y.S.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-uhl-nyappdiv-2006.