In Re the Estate of Riker

5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 350, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 660

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re the Estate of Riker. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 N.J. Eq. 349 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 21, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Bigelow and reported in 124 N. J. Eq. 228.

For affirmance — The Chief- Justice, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Donges, Wells, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Bigelow and reported in 124 N. J. Eq. 228.

For affirmance — The Chief- Justice, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Donges, Wells, JJ. 2.

In Re the Estate of Riker, 5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 350, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 660 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

5 A.2d 685 (In Re the Estate of Riker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.