In Re the Estate of Riker

5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 349
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 21, 1939·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Bigelow and reported in 124 N. J. Eq. 228.

For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Heiiee, Peeskie, Poetee, Hetfield, Deae, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Donges, Wells, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Estate of Riker, 5 A.2d 685, 125 N.J. Eq. 349 (N.J. 1939).

5 A.2d 685 (In Re the Estate of Riker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Cory
74 A.2d 360 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Taylor
69 A.2d 234 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1949)
Camden Trust Co. v. Dubois
41 A.2d 521 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
39 A.2d 120 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)