In re the Estate of Moran

6 Mills Surr. 543, 60 Misc. 298, 113 N.Y.S. 276
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided July 15, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ketcham, S.

Upon appeal from the decree of distribution, the Appellate Division has directed that its reversal of the decree be “ with costs to the appellant.” Costs, in the order to be entered upon the remittitur, can only be awarded according to. the special directions made upon the appeal (Code Civ. Pro., § 2558, subd. 1) ; and the direction quoted contemplates only the costs of the appeal in the appellate court. Among the haphazards of the Code it appears that, upon reversal of a surrogate’s decree, “ with costs ” and without specification of disbursements, the surrogate has no power to include disbursements in his taxation of costs. Matter of Steencken, 58 App. Div. 85. Unless, therefore, the appellant shall receive further direction, the order proposed will include only the costs for making and serving the case and the costs before and after argument.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of Moran, 6 Mills Surr. 543, 60 Misc. 298, 113 N.Y.S. 276 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

6 Mills Surr. 543 (In re the Estate of Moran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Waldron
8 Mills Surr. 442 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1911)