In re the Estate of Hauselt

115 Misc. 713
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 Misc. 713 (In re the Estate of Hauselt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Hauselt, 115 Misc. 713 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1920).

Opinion

Foley, S.

This application by the temporary administrator to distribute what is in effect the entire balance of the estate is denied. It is contrary to the practice of this court and contrary to the law to authorize a distribution of this kind on an eco parte application. The estate originally amounted to $31,000, of which nearly $21,000 has already been paid out. The transfer tax has not been paid or even determined. The temporary administrator should follow the usual practice, file his accounting and cite the necessary parties. The very title of his office defines the limitations on his functions and duties. To make a distribution of the balance by order in the manner here sought might result in leaving no assets for the creditor whose claim has been filed and rejected. Although „the time of the creditor to sue thereon may have expired, as stated in the moving [714]*714affidavit, the creditor has the right to have his claim determined and if allowed ordered paid upon the accounting of the temporary administrator. Code' Civ. Pro., § 2681.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Torres Rodríguez v. González
68 P.R. 43 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 Misc. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-hauselt-nysurct-1920.