In re the Estate of Farley

520 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 155, 1988 WL 2369
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2251
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 520 So. 2d 619 (In re the Estate of Farley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Estate of Farley, 520 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 155, 1988 WL 2369 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant petitioner’s writ of prohibition. The trial court did not have jurisdiction to reopen the inslant estate because the motion was untimely filed under rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1987). See also Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(b). However, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted without prejudice to the respondent to file an independent action.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andy v.Lessem
536 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gray v. Executive Drywall, Inc.
520 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 155, 1988 WL 2369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-farley-fladistctapp-1988.