In re the Estate of Farley
520 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 155, 1988 WL 2369
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1988·No. No. 87-2251·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We grant petitioner’s writ of prohibition. The trial court did not have jurisdiction to reopen the inslant estate because the motion was untimely filed under rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1987). See also Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(b). However, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted without prejudice to the respondent to file an independent action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Estate of Farley, 520 So. 2d 619, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 227, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 155, 1988 WL 2369 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
520 So. 2d 619 (In re the Estate of Farley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Andy v.Lessem
536 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gray v. Executive Drywall, Inc.
520 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)