Andy v.Lessem

536 So. 2d 343, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 155, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5656, 1988 WL 137185
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 21, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2049
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 536 So. 2d 343 (Andy v.Lessem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andy v.Lessem, 536 So. 2d 343, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 155, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5656, 1988 WL 137185 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

The order under review, which derived from the motion of the personal representative of the estate of the putative biological father, to set aside an order vacating the adoption of the appellee, is affirmed. The appellant was not an essential party to the adoption proceeding when it occurred and has no standing now to challenge any aspect or the outcome of that matter. See §§ 63.122 and 63.162, Fla.Stat. (1987). Our affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the appellant’s ability to initiate an independent action. See In re Estate of Farley, 520 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andy v. Lessem
595 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 So. 2d 343, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 155, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5656, 1988 WL 137185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andy-vlessem-fladistctapp-1988.