In Re the Estate of Campbell

46 N.E.2d 908, 289 N.Y. 509, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1153
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 21, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 46 N.E.2d 908 (In Re the Estate of Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Estate of Campbell, 46 N.E.2d 908, 289 N.Y. 509, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1153 (N.Y. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts sustain the findings of the Surrogate. Section 474 of the Judiciary Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 30) relating to attorneys’ fees and retainers, must be read in the light of the fact that the relationship of attorney and client was already in existence between this petitioner and her attorneys when this agreement was made. As showing the trust and confidence reposed in these attorneys by petitioner, when the moneys were received she assented to their distribution without taking account of her right to deduct therefrom the taxes and other expenses payable by the estate of which she was a beneficiary. The contingent arrangement exacted from petitioner by these attorneys provided for a payment fourfold greater than that which was paid to the attorney who actually conducted the litigation. The trial consisted in the main only of introducing the written agreements in evidence and requesting the court to construe the same.

The charge of laches against petitioner must be considered in connection with the fact that the relationship of attorney and client continued, and that petitioner was under her attorneys’ advice regarding the difficult nature of the litigation, and the necessity *513 of consulting no one else until the relationship of attorney and client was ended and she obtained independent advice. From thenceforth the matter was prosecuted with all reasonable diligence.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the decree of the Surrogate’s Court affirmed.

Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur; Lehman, Ch. J., taking no part.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Hallewell
266 A.D. 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
In Re the Estate of Campbell
49 N.E.2d 620 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.E.2d 908, 289 N.Y. 509, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-campbell-ny-1943.