In re the Estate of Brody

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Estate of Brody

155 Misc. 819, 281 N.Y.S. 865, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1989

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedDecember 19, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 155 Misc. 819 (In re the Estate of Brody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Estate of Brody, 155 Misc. 819, 281 N.Y.S. 865, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1989 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Foley, S.

This is an accounting by the administratrix for the proceeds of an action for wrongfully causing the decedent’s death. Objections to the account have been filed by a physician whose el aim for medical services was rejected. The medical services rendered were incidental to the injuries which resulted in the decedent’s death.

The physician’s claim for medical services is not a proper charge against the fund accounted for. The objections to the account [820]*820are, therefore, overruled. Distribution of the fund must be governed by the statute in effect at the date of the decedent’s death. (Matter of Weinstein, 153 Misc. 279; Carpenter v. Buffalo General Electric Co., 213 N. Y. 101; Matter of Brennan, 160 App. Div. 401.) The decedent died January 16, 1933. Prior to the amendment to section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law in 1934 (Laws of ■ 1934, chap. 216, effective September 1, 1934), the statute did not provide for the payment of medical expenses from the proceeds of the action. The fund must be distributed strictly in accordance with the provisions of the statute. (Matter of Weinstein, supra; Matter of Feifer, 151 Misc. 54; Matter of Skater, Id. 56).

Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foley, S.

This is an accounting by the administratrix for the proceeds of an action for wrongfully causing the decedent’s death. Objections to the account have been filed by a physician whose el aim for medical services was rejected. The medical services rendered were incidental to the injuries which resulted in the decedent’s death.

The physician’s claim for medical services is not a proper charge against the fund accounted for. The objections to the account [820]*820are, therefore, overruled. Distribution of the fund must be governed by the statute in effect at the date of the decedent’s death. (Matter of Weinstein, 153 Misc. 279; Carpenter v. Buffalo General Electric Co., 213 N. Y. 101; Matter of Brennan, 160 App. Div. 401.) The decedent died January 16, 1933. Prior to the amendment to section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law in 1934 (Laws of ■ 1934, chap. 216, effective September 1, 1934), the statute did not provide for the payment of medical expenses from the proceeds of the action. The fund must be distributed strictly in accordance with the provisions of the statute. (Matter of Weinstein, supra; Matter of Feifer, 151 Misc. 54; Matter of Skater, Id. 56).

Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 Misc. 819, 281 N.Y.S. 865, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-brody-nysurct-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack