In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Wallis

389 P.2d 421, 63 Wash. 2d 833, 1964 Wash. LEXIS 551
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 20, 1964
DocketC.D. 3765
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 389 P.2d 421 (In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Wallis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Wallis, 389 P.2d 421, 63 Wash. 2d 833, 1964 Wash. LEXIS 551 (Wash. 1964).

Opinion

Ott, C. J.

January 15, 1962, William R. Wallis, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Washington, was charged in the Superior Court for Lewis County with three counts of grand larceny by embezzlement, and, on March 13, 1962, he was charged with another count of grand larceny by embezzlement.

December 24, 1962, he pleaded guilty to the charges as alleged in both informations and was sentenced to the Washington State Penitentiary for not more than 15 years. He is presently serving the sentence imposed.

Disciplinary proceedings were instituted against William R. Wallis, as provided by the Rules for Discipline of Attorneys. Wallis made no appearance. The hearing panel entered findings of fact, and recommended that William R. Wallis be disbarred. The Board of Governors reviewed the proceedings and concurred in the recommendation of the hearing panel.

Rules for Discipline of Attorneys provide that disbarment may follow when an attorney is convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude. Rule for Discipline of Attorneys 1. The crime of grand larceny is a felony and involves moral turpitude. In re Dalton, 60 Wn. (2d) 726, 375 *834 P. (2d) 258 (1962); In re Timothy, 58 Wn. (2d) 153, 361 P. (2d) 642 (1961).

We adopt the recommendation of the hearing panel and the Board of' Governors of the Washington State Bar Association.

It is, therefore, ordered that respondent, William R. Wallis, be, and he hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Washington, and that his name be struck from the roll of attorneys.

All Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Committee on Legal Ethics v. Six
380 S.E.2d 219 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1989)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGrath
655 P.2d 232 (Washington Supreme Court, 1982)
Hoagland v. Mount Vernon School District No. 320
623 P.2d 1156 (Washington Supreme Court, 1981)
Hoagland v. MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL DIST.
623 P.2d 1156 (Washington Supreme Court, 1981)
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Egger
547 P.2d 864 (Washington Supreme Court, 1976)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Krogh
536 P.2d 578 (Washington Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 P.2d 421, 63 Wash. 2d 833, 1964 Wash. LEXIS 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-disciplinary-proceedings-against-wallis-wash-1964.