In re the Claim of Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Wilson

205 A.D.2d 826, 615 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 826 (In re the Claim of Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Wilson, 205 A.D.2d 826, 615 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 4, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was, inter alia, not available for employment.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board for the sole purpose of determining whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [SD NY; 79 Civ 5899]). Claimant fails to allege any procedural errors on appeal and we conclude that the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 4, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was, inter alia, not available for employment.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board for the sole purpose of determining whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [SD NY; 79 Civ 5899]). Claimant fails to allege any procedural errors on appeal and we conclude that the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 826, 615 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-wilson-nyappdiv-1994.