In re the Claim of Wilson

223 A.D.2d 903, 636 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 385
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 19,1995, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The evidence is undisputed that claimant left his position as a toll collector after he was informed that his manager wished to terminate him, but prior to receiving an official notice of termination. In view of this, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Wilson, 223 A.D.2d 903, 636 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

223 A.D.2d 903 (In re the Claim of Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Toth
244 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Nalick
243 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)