In re the Claim of Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Wilson

223 A.D.2d 903, 636 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 385

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 903 (In re the Claim of Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Wilson, 223 A.D.2d 903, 636 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 19,1995, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The evidence is undisputed that claimant left his position as a toll collector after he was informed that his manager wished to terminate him, but prior to receiving an official notice of termination. In view of this, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 19,1995, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The evidence is undisputed that claimant left his position as a toll collector after he was informed that his manager wished to terminate him, but prior to receiving an official notice of termination. In view of this, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 903, 636 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-wilson-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack