Home/New York Court of Appeals/In Re the Claim of Tucker

In Re the Claim of Tucker

171 N.E.2d 904, 8 N.Y.2d 1145, 209 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 840
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 1, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 171 N.E.2d 904 (In Re the Claim of Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Claim of Tucker, 171 N.E.2d 904, 8 N.Y.2d 1145, 209 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 840 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinions

Upon reargument: Order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated upon the ground that there was adequate support in the record for the board’s finding that claimant was not reasonably fitted by training and experience to take a position as typist (Labor Law, § 591, subd. 2; Matter of Burger [Corsi], 303 N. Y. 654).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Nolan

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Consentino
71 A.D.2d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Mtr. of Green (Republic Steel)
338 N.E.2d 594 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
In Re the Claim of Tucker
171 N.E.2d 904 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 N.E.2d 904, 8 N.Y.2d 1145, 209 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-tucker-ny-1960.