In Re the Claim of Tucker
171 N.E.2d 904, 8 N.Y.2d 1145, 209 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 840
Opinions
Upon reargument: Order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reinstated upon the ground that there was adequate support in the record for the board’s finding that claimant was not reasonably fitted by training and experience to take a position as typist (Labor Law, § 591, subd. 2; Matter of Burger [Corsi], 303 N. Y. 654).
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Nolan
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Claim of Tucker, 171 N.E.2d 904, 8 N.Y.2d 1145, 209 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 840 (N.Y. 1960).
171 N.E.2d 904 (In Re the Claim of Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Claim of Consentino
71 A.D.2d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Mtr. of Green (Republic Steel)
338 N.E.2d 594 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
In Re the Claim of Tucker
171 N.E.2d 904 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)