In re the Claim of Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Santiago

215 A.D.2d 860, 626 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5004

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 860 (In re the Claim of Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Santiago, 215 A.D.2d 860, 626 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 1993, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant, a legal secretary employed by the employer for 6V2 years, quit her employment after her employer had an altercation with her boyfriend which resulted in the boyfriend being thrown through a wall and required him to be hospitalized. This, coupled with evidence indicating that the employer singled claimant out for a reduction in vacation benefits and no raise, provided substantial evidence supporting the Board’s decision that claimant had good cause to leave her employment. Accordingly, the Board’s decision must be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 1993, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant, a legal secretary employed by the employer for 6V2 years, quit her employment after her employer had an altercation with her boyfriend which resulted in the boyfriend being thrown through a wall and required him to be hospitalized. This, coupled with evidence indicating that the employer singled claimant out for a reduction in vacation benefits and no raise, provided substantial evidence supporting the Board’s decision that claimant had good cause to leave her employment. Accordingly, the Board’s decision must be upheld.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 860, 626 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-santiago-nyappdiv-1995.