In re the Claim of Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Santiago

198 A.D.2d 699, 605 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10740

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 699 (In re the Claim of Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Santiago, 198 A.D.2d 699, 605 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 27, 1992, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had insufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

It cannot be disputed from this record that claimant, a security guard, was ineligible to receive benefits because he did not have sufficient weeks of employment in his base period to file an original valid claim. While claimant argues that the applicable legislation barring his claim should be changed, such a request should more appropriately be addressed to the Legislature.

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, White and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 27, 1992, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had insufficient weeks of covered employment to file a valid original claim.

It cannot be disputed from this record that claimant, a security guard, was ineligible to receive benefits because he did not have sufficient weeks of employment in his base period to file an original valid claim. While claimant argues that the applicable legislation barring his claim should be changed, such a request should more appropriately be addressed to the Legislature.

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, White and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 699, 605 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-santiago-nyappdiv-1993.