In re the Claim of Rosenfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Rosenfield

205 A.D.2d 823, 613 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 823 (In re the Claim of Rosenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Rosenfield, 205 A.D.2d 823, 613 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a supervisor for the employer, an eyeglass frame manufacturer. After the employer cautioned claimant to increase production or face demotion, claimant [824]*824resigned. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant’s resignation from employment was voluntary and without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a supervisor for the employer, an eyeglass frame manufacturer. After the employer cautioned claimant to increase production or face demotion, claimant [824]*824resigned. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant’s resignation from employment was voluntary and without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 823, 613 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-rosenfield-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack