In re the Claim of Rosenfield

205 A.D.2d 823, 613 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5895
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 2, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a supervisor for the employer, an eyeglass frame manufacturer. After the employer cautioned claimant to increase production or face demotion, claimant [824] resigned. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant’s resignation from employment was voluntary and without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Rosenfield, 205 A.D.2d 823, 613 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 823 (In re the Claim of Rosenfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Volpe v. Sweeney
232 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Claim of Hoover
232 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Claim of Lackey
232 A.D.2d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Claim of Kilgallen
222 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)