In re the Claim of Hoover

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Hoover

232 A.D.2d 808, 648 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 808 (In re the Claim of Hoover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Hoover, 232 A.D.2d 808, 648 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 20, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her position as project director of a youth services agency, complaining of various adverse circumstances including being treated in an unfriendly manner by her supervisor, being divested of certain prior duties and having less experienced workers promoted to positions superior to her own. The Board subsequently determined that claimant was ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits because she had voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

Dissatisfaction with one’s job, such as that expressed by claimant, does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Rosenfield [Hudacs], 205 AD2d 823, 824; Matter of Mele [St. Vincent Hosp.—Hartnett], 176 AD2d 414, 415). Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the Board’s decision finding claimant to be disqualified for benefits was supported by substantial evidence and we, accordingly, affirm.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 20, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her position as project director of a youth services agency, complaining of various adverse circumstances including being treated in an unfriendly manner by her supervisor, being divested of certain prior duties and having less experienced workers promoted to positions superior to her own. The Board subsequently determined that claimant was ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits because she had voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

Dissatisfaction with one’s job, such as that expressed by claimant, does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see, Matter of Rosenfield [Hudacs], 205 AD2d 823, 824; Matter of Mele [St. Vincent Hosp.—Hartnett], 176 AD2d 414, 415). Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the Board’s decision finding claimant to be disqualified for benefits was supported by substantial evidence and we, accordingly, affirm.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D.2d 808, 648 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-hoover-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack