In re the Claim of Reilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Reilly

81 A.D.2d 682, 439 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 682 (In re the Claim of Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Reilly, 81 A.D.2d 682, 439 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 19, 1980, which affirmed the decision of an Administrative Law Judge sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective March 21, 1980 because she lost her employment through misconduct in connection therewith. The decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board is supported by substantial evidence in the record which establishes that claimant was discharged for misconduct and is, therefore, disqualified from receiving benefits (see Matter of McGlynn [Levine], 52 AD2d 709; Matter of Lester [Catherwood], 30 AD2d 1025). Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 19, 1980, which affirmed the decision of an Administrative Law Judge sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective March 21, 1980 because she lost her employment through misconduct in connection therewith. The decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board is supported by substantial evidence in the record which establishes that claimant was discharged for misconduct and is, therefore, disqualified from receiving benefits (see Matter of McGlynn [Levine], 52 AD2d 709; Matter of Lester [Catherwood], 30 AD2d 1025). Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 682, 439 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-reilly-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack