Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Claim of Lester

In re the Claim of Lester

30 A.D.2d 1025, 294 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3054
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1968·Published·Cited by 36 cases

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from benefits because he lost employment through his misconduct (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 3). The determination of the board that claimant lost his employment through misconduct is factual and thus must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence (e.g., Matter of Rivera [Catherwood], 28 A D 2d 1036). The issue of credibility is also clearly within the exclusive province of the board (e.g., Matter of Soman [Glenshaw Glass], 28 A D 2d 219). Here there is present no more than conflicting testimony as to claimant’s actions on the day prior to his release and what, in fact, precipitated his discharge. We find no basis to disturb the board’s resolution. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Lester, 30 A.D.2d 1025, 294 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 1025 (In re the Claim of Lester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
501 A.2d 1383 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Peak v. COM., UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD.
501 A.2d 1383 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Moore v. Ross
687 F.2d 604 (Second Circuit, 1982)
In re the Claim of Reilly
81 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re the Claim of Turchin
64 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Claim of Morgen v. CBS, Inc.
54 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Shea
53 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Levick
53 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Norman
53 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Walshon
53 A.D.2d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Sanford
52 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Zaccheo
52 A.D.2d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Krumper
52 A.D.2d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Effress
52 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of McGlynn
52 A.D.2d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Woods
52 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Williams
52 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Azzu
52 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Terry
51 A.D.2d 1096 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Neiverth
51 A.D.2d 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)