In re the Claim of Perrotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Perrotta

207 A.D.2d 934, 616 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8815

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 934 (In re the Claim of Perrotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Perrotta, 207 A.D.2d 934, 616 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 12, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant left her job of four years to relocate with her husband to Florida. Although claimant’s husband was ill, there was no evidence in the record that he was given any medical advice to move to a warmer climate nor was there evidence that claimant’s presence in Florida was needed to care for him. Under the circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 12, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant left her job of four years to relocate with her husband to Florida. Although claimant’s husband was ill, there was no evidence in the record that he was given any medical advice to move to a warmer climate nor was there evidence that claimant’s presence in Florida was needed to care for him. Under the circumstances, substantial evidence exists to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 934, 616 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-perrotta-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack