In re the Claim of Economy

232 A.D.2d 799, 648 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10258
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 799 (In re the Claim of Economy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Economy, 232 A.D.2d 799, 648 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 21, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant left her job as a bank teller to relocate to Florida with her ailing husband. The Unemployment Insurance Ap[800]*800peal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Based upon our review of the record, we find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.

Claimant testified that her husband’s doctor had recommended that he move to Florida for medical reasons, therefore, she resigned from her position in order to accompany him. She stated, however, that neither she nor her husband moved to Florida until nearly one year after this recommendation. Claimant further stated that, prior to moving, her husband traveled extensively by himself to Florida, Canada and Greece. She also stated that he moved to Florida before she did.

Since it is evident from claimant’s testimony that her presence in Florida was not necessary to attend to her husband’s medical needs, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant’s resignation was due to personal and non-compelling reasons (see, Matter of Perrotta [Hudacs], 207 AD2d 934; see also, Matter of Levine [Sweeney], 212 AD2d 848).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Torres
257 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Claim of Prevost
256 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Shubert
253 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Carrasquillo
250 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D.2d 799, 648 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-economy-nyappdiv-1996.