In re the Claim of Obafemi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Obafemi

250 A.D.2d 905, 672 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5385

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 250 A.D.2d 905 (In re the Claim of Obafemi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Obafemi, 250 A.D.2d 905, 672 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 8, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Following an arbitration hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, claimant was discharged from his employment as a toll collector for being discourteous to customers. We find no error in the Board’s determination to give “collateral estoppel effect to the factual findings of the arbitrator inasmuch as claimant was given a fall and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of his misconduct at the arbitration hearing” (Matter of Carter [New York City Dept. of Personnel—Sweeney], 242 AD2d [906]*906777, 778). Given the arbitrator’s finding that claimant was rude to a customer despite prior warnings to refrain from such inappropriate behavior, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Inman [Sweeney], 241 AD2d 619). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Carpinello and GrafFeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 8, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Following an arbitration hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, claimant was discharged from his employment as a toll collector for being discourteous to customers. We find no error in the Board’s determination to give “collateral estoppel effect to the factual findings of the arbitrator inasmuch as claimant was given a fall and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of his misconduct at the arbitration hearing” (Matter of Carter [New York City Dept. of Personnel—Sweeney], 242 AD2d [906]*906777, 778). Given the arbitrator’s finding that claimant was rude to a customer despite prior warnings to refrain from such inappropriate behavior, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Inman [Sweeney], 241 AD2d 619). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Carpinello and GrafFeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 905, 672 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-obafemi-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack