In re the Claim of Carter
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 17, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Following an arbitration hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, claimant was discharged from his employment as a correction officer for various violations of his employer’s [778]*778policies and regulations regarding, inter alia, sick leave.
Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
On administrative appeal of the arbitrator’s decision, which was not complete at the time of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision, the factual findings were affirmed but suspension was recommended rather than termination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
242 A.D.2d 777 (In re the Claim of Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.