In re the Claim of Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Morgan

30 A.D.2d 595, 290 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3980

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 595 (In re the Claim of Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Morgan, 30 A.D.2d 595, 290 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held him ineligible to receive benefits and that he made a willful false representation. While it is exemplary that he should have the desire to seek employment, it is likewise important that he comply with the rules and regulations of the Unemployment Insurance office. As we have stated on prior occasions, the volume of the business of the agency is such that altering booklets and other forms, and failure to report to the office in accordance with duly assigned dates are sufficient reasons for determining the applicant ineligible for benefits. Additionally, unauthorized alterations of an official entry in the claimant’s insurance booklet is sufficient to constitute willful misrepresentation. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P„ J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, concur in memorandum J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held him ineligible to receive benefits and that he made a willful false representation. While it is exemplary that he should have the desire to seek employment, it is likewise important that he comply with the rules and regulations of the Unemployment Insurance office. As we have stated on prior occasions, the volume of the business of the agency is such that altering booklets and other forms, and failure to report to the office in accordance with duly assigned dates are sufficient reasons for determining the applicant ineligible for benefits. Additionally, unauthorized alterations of an official entry in the claimant’s insurance booklet is sufficient to constitute willful misrepresentation. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P„ J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, concur in memorandum J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 595, 290 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-morgan-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack