In re the Claim of Andrews

49 A.D.2d 996, 374 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11327

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 27, 1975, which held claimant willfully made false statements in order to obtain benefits, by reason of which a forfeiture of eight effective days was imposed as a penalty. The board found that claimant was responsible for an alteration in her insurance booklet. Unauthorized alterations are sufficient to constitute willful misrepresentation (Matter of Morgan [Catherwood], 30 AD2d 595). Questions of fact and credibility are raised and are solely within the province of the board whose determinations are supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Andrews, 49 A.D.2d 996, 374 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

49 A.D.2d 996 (In re the Claim of Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Morgan
30 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)