In re the Claim of Maier

207 A.D.2d 932, 616 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8807
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 17, 1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he failed to comply with registration requirements.

Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant, a metal plant worker, was ineligible to receive benefits during the two-week period his employer’s plant was shut down because claimant failed to comply with applicable registration requirements. Based on claimant’s own testimony, the Board was justified in concluding that his failure to timely register occurred because of his own mistaken belief that he was ineligible to receive benefits and not because of any [933]*933misinformation or misrepresentations from his employer or the local office. In the absence of a valid excuse from claimant for his failure to register promptly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s determination.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Maier, 207 A.D.2d 932, 616 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 932 (In re the Claim of Maier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Paterson
14 A.D.3d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re the Claim of Frazier
231 A.D.2d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)