In re the Claim of Frazier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Frazier

231 A.D.2d 773, 647 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 5, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D.2d 773 (In re the Claim of Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Frazier, 231 A.D.2d 773, 647 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 11, 1995, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she did not comply with registration requirements.

Claimant filed an original claim for unemployment insurance benefits on November 30, 1993, thereby establishing a base period beginning November 30, 1992 and ending November 28, 1993. Prior to filing her claim, claimant worked for the New York City Department of Social Services from April 16, 1975 until December 6,1992. She worked for another employer, Green Thumb, Inc., from November 15, 1993 to November 30, 1993 on a part-time basis. The Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that claimant failed to comply with registration requirements. The Board further found that claimant did not file a valid original claim because she did not have at least 15 weeks of covered employment in her base period. Inasmuch as claimant failed to demonstrate a good cause for her failure to comply with registration requirements (see, Labor Law § 596; 12 NYCRR 473.1 Eh]; see also, Matter of Maier [Hudacs], 207 AD2d 932) or to establish that she had a sufficient number of weeks of covered employment in her base period (see, Labor Law § 527), we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 11, 1995, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she did not comply with registration requirements.

Claimant filed an original claim for unemployment insurance benefits on November 30, 1993, thereby establishing a base period beginning November 30, 1992 and ending November 28, 1993. Prior to filing her claim, claimant worked for the New York City Department of Social Services from April 16, 1975 until December 6,1992. She worked for another employer, Green Thumb, Inc., from November 15, 1993 to November 30, 1993 on a part-time basis. The Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that claimant failed to comply with registration requirements. The Board further found that claimant did not file a valid original claim because she did not have at least 15 weeks of covered employment in her base period. Inasmuch as claimant failed to demonstrate a good cause for her failure to comply with registration requirements (see, Labor Law § 596; 12 NYCRR 473.1 Eh]; see also, Matter of Maier [Hudacs], 207 AD2d 932) or to establish that she had a sufficient number of weeks of covered employment in her base period (see, Labor Law § 527), we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 773, 647 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-frazier-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack