In re the Claim of Lodico

11 A.D.2d 873, 203 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8401
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 27, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 A.D.2d 873 (In re the Claim of Lodico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Lodico, 11 A.D.2d 873, 203 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. This appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board involves the employment of the president of the same concrete construction corporation considered in Matter of D’Angelo (Catherwood) (11 A D 2d 825). There the ruling of the board that two corporate officers were not “totally unemployed” within subdivision 1 of section 591 of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18) was affirmed on the ground that discontinuance of work by corporate officers who retain control over distribution of work and salary in a seasonal occupation was not total unemployment. (Cf. Matter of North, 266 App. Div. 934, motion, for leave to appeal denied 292 N. Y. 724). This ease is governed by the same principle but evidence that claimant was not totally unemployed is here somewhat stronger. The record would sustain a finding that claimant was paid a small amount by the corporation for the use of equipment owned by him; had his telephone bill paid by the corporation; and during the time claimed for unemployment benefits, made bids on a job for his corporation; at other times he solicited business for the corporation. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlsen v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
64 Cal. App. 3d 577 (California Court of Appeal, 1976)
Cooperman v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
49 Cal. App. 3d 1 (California Court of Appeal, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.2d 873, 203 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-lodico-nyappdiv-1960.