In re the Claim of Labayen

301 A.D.2d 1014, 753 N.Y.S.2d 758, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 678
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 301 A.D.2d 1014 (In re the Claim of Labayen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Labayen, 301 A.D.2d 1014, 753 N.Y.S.2d 758, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 23, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment after he violated the employer’s zero tolerance against violence policy by engaging in a physical altercation with a coworker during working hours. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insur[1015]*1015anee benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. It is well settled that fighting with a coworker, regardless of who initiates it, can constitute misconduct (see Matter of Abbondanzo [Commissioner of Labor], 275 AD2d 850, lv denied 96 NY2d 713; Matter of Wray [Commissioner of Labor], 268 AD2d 731). Here, claimant testified that he reacted when the coworker kicked him by grabbing the coworker’s shirt and started pushing and shoving him. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Eisenstadt
10 A.D.3d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Cedeno
6 A.D.3d 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Shivpal
309 A.D.2d 1135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Caldwell
306 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 A.D.2d 1014, 753 N.Y.S.2d 758, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-labayen-nyappdiv-2003.