In re the Claim of La Fever

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of La Fever

241 A.D.2d 589, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7239

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1997·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 7, 1996, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision dismissing claimant’s appeal as untimely.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissed claimant’s application to reopen a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely. Inasmuch as claimant failed to appeal the decision within the 20-day period set forth in Labor Law § 621 (1), we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision (see, Matter of Braz [Hudacs], 211 AD2d 938).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 7, 1996, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision dismissing claimant’s appeal as untimely.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissed claimant’s application to reopen a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely. Inasmuch as claimant failed to appeal the decision within the 20-day period set forth in Labor Law § 621 (1), we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision (see, Matter of Braz [Hudacs], 211 AD2d 938).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

In re the Claim of La Fever, 241 A.D.2d 589, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

241 A.D.2d 589 (In re the Claim of La Fever) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related