In re the Claim of Braz

211 A.D.2d 938, 621 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 224
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1995·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 19, 1994, which denied claimant’s application for reopening and reconsideration.

We find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s rejection of claimant’s application to reopen the Board’s prior decision ruling that claimant’s appeal to the Board was untimely. In any event, given the explicit provisions of Labor Law § 621 (1) regarding the timeliness of appeals, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s determination.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Braz, 211 A.D.2d 938, 621 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 938 (In re the Claim of Braz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Bartel
300 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re the Claim of La Fever
241 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Mulheron
240 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re Martino
239 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Trincere
235 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)