In re the Claim of Ishida

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Ishida

249 A.D.2d 619, 670 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3593

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 619 (In re the Claim of Ishida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Ishida, 249 A.D.2d 619, 670 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for a temporary employment agency and quit her assignment as a legal assistant in order to search for a position as a translator. Thereafter, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals and we affirm. Inasmuch as the record indicates that continued work was available to claimant, substantial evidence [620]*620supports the Board’s decision (see, Matter of Brady [Sweeney], 228 AD2d 840, 841; Matter of Feinberg [Hudacs], 211 AD2d 934). Claimant’s remaining contentions, including her claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for a temporary employment agency and quit her assignment as a legal assistant in order to search for a position as a translator. Thereafter, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals and we affirm. Inasmuch as the record indicates that continued work was available to claimant, substantial evidence [620]*620supports the Board’s decision (see, Matter of Brady [Sweeney], 228 AD2d 840, 841; Matter of Feinberg [Hudacs], 211 AD2d 934). Claimant’s remaining contentions, including her claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 619, 670 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-ishida-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack