In re the Claim of Brady
This text of 228 A.D.2d 840 (In re the Claim of Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[841]*841Claimant worked for a temporary employment agency which provides secretarial services. Claimant accepted an assignment performing secretarial and administrative duties, but failed to return to it after a two-day training session. The Board, inter alia, disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Claimant testified that after she accepted the assignment, she felt that the responsibilities were more extensive than originally represented and that she deserved a higher hourly rate of pay. She stated that she would have stayed with the assignment had her compensation been increased. Given the reason for claimant’s failure to complete the assignment, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Cardona, P. J., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D.2d 840, 643 N.Y.2d 777, 643 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-brady-nyappdiv-1996.