In re the Claim of Brady

228 A.D.2d 840, 643 N.Y.2d 777, 643 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6684
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[841] Claimant worked for a temporary employment agency which provides secretarial services. Claimant accepted an assignment performing secretarial and administrative duties, but failed to return to it after a two-day training session. The Board, inter alia, disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Claimant testified that after she accepted the assignment, she felt that the responsibilities were more extensive than originally represented and that she deserved a higher hourly rate of pay. She stated that she would have stayed with the assignment had her compensation been increased. Given the reason for claimant’s failure to complete the assignment, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Cardona, P. J., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Brady, 228 A.D.2d 840, 643 N.Y.2d 777, 643 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 840 (In re the Claim of Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Ishida
249 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)