In re the Claim of Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Hernandez

165 A.D.2d 943, 561 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11292

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 165 A.D.2d 943 (In re the Claim of Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Hernandez, 165 A.D.2d 943, 561 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 8, 1990, which denied claimant’s application for reconsideration of a prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Insofar as claimant submitted no new evidence to support his request that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reconsider its prior decision, there was no abuse of discretion by the Board in rejecting the application (see, Matter of Cruz [944]*944[Levine], 49 AD2d 978). In any event, although claimant argued that he could not work overtime as directed by the employer due to a rib injury, he failed to offer any medical proof to support his argument; therefore the Board’s original conclusion that claimant’s refusal to work overtime constituted misconduct was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Haas [Levine], 51 AD2d 838).

Decision affirmed, without costs.

Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 8, 1990, which denied claimant’s application for reconsideration of a prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Insofar as claimant submitted no new evidence to support his request that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reconsider its prior decision, there was no abuse of discretion by the Board in rejecting the application (see, Matter of Cruz [944]*944[Levine], 49 AD2d 978). In any event, although claimant argued that he could not work overtime as directed by the employer due to a rib injury, he failed to offer any medical proof to support his argument; therefore the Board’s original conclusion that claimant’s refusal to work overtime constituted misconduct was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Haas [Levine], 51 AD2d 838).

Decision affirmed, without costs.

Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 A.D.2d 943, 561 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-hernandez-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack