In re the Claim of Haas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Haas

51 A.D.2d 838, 380 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11438

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 838 (In re the Claim of Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Haas, 51 A.D.2d 838, 380 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 5, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective August 13, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant left his employment primarily for health reasons, contending that the midnight shift and the nature of the work affected him physically and mentally. He thereafter moved to Arizona to join his parents. No probative medical evidence was produced to substantiate the claimant’s contention. There is substantial evidence to sustain the board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 5, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective August 13, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant left his employment primarily for health reasons, contending that the midnight shift and the nature of the work affected him physically and mentally. He thereafter moved to Arizona to join his parents. No probative medical evidence was produced to substantiate the claimant’s contention. There is substantial evidence to sustain the board’s finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 838, 380 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-haas-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack