In re the Claim of Chandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Chandler

240 A.D.2d 816, 659 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6018

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 1997·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 17, 1996, which dismissed claimant’s appeal as untimely.

Claimant failed to file her notice of appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the 20-day time limit set forth in Labor Law § 621 (1). Claimant has failed to offer a valid excuse for the delay in filing and we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissing her appeal (see, Matter of Ascenzo [Sweeney], 216 AD2d 659, 660; Matter of Sidoli [Hudacs], 202 AD2d 941).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 17, 1996, which dismissed claimant’s appeal as untimely.

Claimant failed to file her notice of appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the 20-day time limit set forth in Labor Law § 621 (1). Claimant has failed to offer a valid excuse for the delay in filing and we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissing her appeal (see, Matter of Ascenzo [Sweeney], 216 AD2d 659, 660; Matter of Sidoli [Hudacs], 202 AD2d 941).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

In re the Claim of Chandler, 240 A.D.2d 816, 659 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

240 A.D.2d 816 (In re the Claim of Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related