Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Claim of Ascenzo

In re the Claim of Ascenzo

216 A.D.2d 659, 627 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6160
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 659 (In re the Claim of Ascenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Ascenzo, 216 A.D.2d 659, 627 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 28, 1994, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding that claimant did not appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the statutory 20-day [660]*660time period. Claimant has offered no excuse for the delay in filing his notice of appeal. Consequently, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Jowers
295 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re the Claim of Palmer
250 A.D.2d 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Chandler
240 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D.2d 659, 627 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-ascenzo-nyappdiv-1995.