In re the Claim of Ascenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Ascenzo

216 A.D.2d 659, 627 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6160

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 28, 1994, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding that claimant did not appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the statutory 20-day [660] time period. Claimant has offered no excuse for the delay in filing his notice of appeal. Consequently, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 28, 1994, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s finding that claimant did not appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the statutory 20-day [660] time period. Claimant has offered no excuse for the delay in filing his notice of appeal. Consequently, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

In re the Claim of Ascenzo, 216 A.D.2d 659, 627 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

216 A.D.2d 659 (In re the Claim of Ascenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related