In re the Claim of Cassetta

282 A.D. 793, 122 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4973
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 2, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 282 A.D. 793 (In re the Claim of Cassetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Cassetta, 282 A.D. 793, 122 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Hnemployment Insurance Appeal Board, affirming decisions of a referee holding that [794]*794claimants, members of a “name band”, were employees of appellant. The orchestra leader and the musicians involved operated under a written contract with appellant, known as a “ Form B ” contract. A contract identical in terms was involved in Matter of Motels Statler Co. (Corsi) (279 App. Div. 814, motion for leave to appeal denied 279 App. Div. 957, motion for leave to appeal denied 304 1ST T. 987), and a finding that the hotel was the employer was upheld. The only difference between this case and the Statler case is that here a typewritten rider was attached to the contract, which read: “Buss Morgan acknowledges that he conducts ‘a name band’ and is therefore responsible for Social Security taxes and Unemployment taxes on himself, members of orchestra and vocalists.” Respondent urges that this rider is invalid under subdivision 8 of section 570 of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, art. 18) which voids agreements by employees to pay contributions. If the band leader and the musicians are employees of the hotel, of course the rider is invalid. However, the case does not turn upon that point. If, in fact, they are employees of the hotel, any acknowledgment which might be construed to the contrary does not alter their status. The board has determined the relationship as a factual question, and the Statler case is authority for upholding the finding. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Industrial Commissioner. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [See post, p. 845.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Basin St.(lubin)
160 N.E.2d 517 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
In re Moredall Realty Corp.
2 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
In re Savoy Ballroom Corp.
286 A.D. 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
In re the Claim of Jamestown Lodge No. 1681 Loyal Order of Moose, Inc.
285 A.D. 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
In re the Claim of Hoppl
285 A.D. 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D. 793, 122 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cassetta-nyappdiv-1953.