In Re the Claim of Camgros

50 N.E.2d 238, 290 N.Y. 838, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1423
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 27, 1943·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Upon the appeals by Joseph P. Day, Inc., New York Hotel Statler Company, Inc., and Hotels Statler Company, Inc.: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Rippey, Lewis and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., and Conway, J. Taking no part: Finch, J.

Upon the appeal by Firm Amusement Corporation: Order of Appellate Division and decision of Unemployment Board reversed, and claim dismissed, with costs in all courts, upon the ground that there is no evidence to support the finding that the musicians were employees of the operator of the theatre.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Claim of Camgros, 50 N.E.2d 238, 290 N.Y. 838, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1423 (N.Y. 1943).

50 N.E.2d 238 (In Re the Claim of Camgros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Savoy Ballroom Corp.
286 A.D. 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Goldfarb v. Herman
193 Misc. 302 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
In re Roseland Amusement Co.
269 A.D. 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)