In re the Claim of Benton

268 A.D.2d 936, 702 N.Y.S.2d 691, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 810
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 936 (In re the Claim of Benton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Benton, 268 A.D.2d 936, 702 N.Y.S.2d 691, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 17, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed August 31, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision.

Claimant was discharged from his employment after fighting with a co-worker during work hours. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. Claimant’s contention that he was not the aggressor, but rather the victim of an assault, presented a credibility issue for the Board to [937]*937resolve (see, Matter of Kahn [Commissioner of Labor], 249 AD2d 669). In any event, fighting with a co-worker, regardless of who initiated it, may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Williams [National School Bus Serv.—Commissioner of Labor], 257 AD2d 839).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of McCray
301 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Perez
284 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Claim of Abbondanzo
275 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 936, 702 N.Y.S.2d 691, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-benton-nyappdiv-2000.