In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Alford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Alford

260 A.D. 826, 22 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D. 826 (In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Alford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Alford, 260 A.D. 826, 22 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

‘Appeal by alleged employer from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which determined that claimant was an employee of the Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. and not an independent contractor. The identical question was before the court in Matter of Levine v. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co,, Inc, (258 App. Div. 1023). This court held that Levine was an independent contractor and the decision was affirmed (sub nom. Matter of Levine, 283 N. Y. 577). Determination reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to appellant against the Industrial Commissioner. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

‘Appeal by alleged employer from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which determined that claimant was an employee of the Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. and not an independent contractor. The identical question was before the court in Matter of Levine v. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co,, Inc, (258 App. Div. 1023). This court held that Levine was an independent contractor and the decision was affirmed (sub nom. Matter of Levine, 283 N. Y. 577). Determination reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to appellant against the Industrial Commissioner. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 826, 22 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-for-benefits-under-article-18-of-the-labor-law-made-by-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack