In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Dellapenta

261 A.D. 863, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7807
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 863 (In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Dellapenta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Dellapenta, 261 A.D. 863, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Appeal by the Hotels Statler Co., Inc., from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, affirming the decision of a referee which held that claimant was an employee of appellant. The latter conducts a hotel in the city of Buffalo, N. Y., and maintains therein a cocktail lounge where music is furnished for the entertainment of patrons. The manager of the hotel employed one Jack Valentine to procure and organize trios of musicians'for the purpose of playing music in the lounge. Claimant was a member of one of such trios. The Board has found that Valentine was the agent of appellant, and that the latter, through its manager, dictated the selection of personnel for each trio and the hours of employment. Also that appellant had the right to disband any trio upon two weeks’ notice to the leader, and that this in effect conferred upon it the right to discharge a musician whose services were unsatisfactory. There is substantial evidence to sustain these findings and the decision of the Board. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Industrial Commissioner. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Sehenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chatman v. Johnny J. Jones Exposition, Inc.
47 S.E.2d 302 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 863, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-for-benefits-under-article-18-of-the-labor-law-made-by-nyappdiv-1941.