In re the City of New York

272 A.D.2d 826
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 A.D. 131

Opinion

Final decree in condemnation, insofar as it apportions the awards for damage parcel Ho. 7, between the owners of the fee and the lessee, reversed on the law and facts, without costs, and the proceeding remitted to Special Term to ascertain and determine the actual market value of the unexpired term of the lease at the time of the vesting of title in the City of Hew York. The full amount of awards for this parcel as stated in the decree, $36,000, is not questioned. The building upon the parcel was owned by the owners of the fee at the time [827]*827of taking. (People ex rel. International Nan. Co. v. Barker, 153 N. Y. 98; People ex rel. N. 5. Day Line v. Franck, 257 N. Y. 69; Matter of City of New York [Delancey Street], 120 App. Div. 700.) The lessee is entitled to an award in damages of the market value of the unexpired term of its lease at the time of vesting of title in the city. (Clarkson v. Skidmore, 46 N. Y. 297, 302; Larkin v. Misland, 100 N. Y, 212, 213; People ex rel. V. S. Rubber Co. V. Knapp, 232 N. Y. 153, 160.) The owner of the fee is entitled to the full amount of the award for the land and improvements, less the value of the remaining leasehold estate. (Matter of the City of New York [Delancey Street], 120 App. Div. 700, supra; Matter of City of New York [Seventh Ave.], 196 App. Div. 451.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 272 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

272 A.D.2d 826 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. United States Rubber Co. v. Knapp
133 N.E. 429 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Clarkson v. . Skidmore
46 N.Y. 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)
People Ex Rel. International Navigation Co. v. Barker
47 N.E. 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
People Ex Rel. Hudson River Day Line v. Franck
177 N.E. 312 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
In re the City of New York
196 A.D. 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
In re Delancey Street
105 N.Y.S. 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)