In re the City of New York

268 A.D. 960, 51 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4411
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 A.D. 555

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Giving proper relative weight to the conflicting evidence, we think that the land award on each of the four damage parcels involved is inadequate and should in each instance be increased to the sum of $8,750. (Matter of City of New York [Amsterdam Houses], 266 App. Div. 828, affd. 292 N. Y. 698.) The final decree so far as appealed from should accordingly be modified by allowing an award on Damage Parcel No. 8 of $14,750 (improvements $6,000); on Damage Parcel No. 20 of $14,750 (improvements $6,000); on Damage Parcel No. 22 of $14,750 (improvements $6,000); and on Damage Parcel No. 37 of $15,250 (improvements $6,500) and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Decree, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified as indicated in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the City of New York, 268 A.D. 960, 51 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 960 (In re the City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of City of New York
56 N.E.2d 113 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
In re the City of New York
266 A.D. 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)