In re the Arbitration of Certain Differences between Orange Pulp & Paper Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration of Certain Differences between Orange Pulp & Paper Mills, Inc.

261 A.D. 840, 24 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7715

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 840 (In re the Arbitration of Certain Differences between Orange Pulp & Paper Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration of Certain Differences between Orange Pulp & Paper Mills, Inc., 261 A.D. 840, 24 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration and designating an arbitrator reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and proceeding dismissed. We construe paragraph “ 4 ” of the conditions attached to the contract as contemplating that the arbitrator or arbitrators should be selected in the manner provided by the Rules of the American Arbitration Association. (Matter of Oltarsh v. Classic Dresses, Inc., 255 App. Div. 532.) We dismiss the proceeding because the appellant had not failed, neglected or refused to arbitrate and, therefore, was not in default under section 1450 of the Civil Practice Act. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration and designating an arbitrator reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and proceeding dismissed. We construe paragraph “ 4 ” of the conditions attached to the contract as contemplating that the arbitrator or arbitrators should be selected in the manner provided by the Rules of the American Arbitration Association. (Matter of Oltarsh v. Classic Dresses, Inc., 255 App. Div. 532.) We dismiss the proceeding because the appellant had not failed, neglected or refused to arbitrate and, therefore, was not in default under section 1450 of the Civil Practice Act. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 840, 24 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-of-certain-differences-between-orange-pulp-paper-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack