In re the Arbitration between Vogel & Lewis
This text of 224 N.E.2d 738 (In re the Arbitration between Vogel & Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. We neither consider nor pass upon the merits of the dispute to be arbitrated. We decide only that, when viewed against the factual background of the case, the arbitration clause contained in the agreement between the parties encompasses the controversy which has arisen and that such controversy is a proper subject for arbitration. As directed in Special Term’s order of August 16, 1965, “ the arbitration * * * shall proceed forthwith in accordance with the agreement ”.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitbl.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 N.E.2d 738, 19 N.Y.2d 589, 278 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-vogel-lewis-ny-1967.