In re the Arbitration between Richard Spychalski & Continental Insurance Companies
This text of 382 N.E.2d 765 (In re the Arbitration between Richard Spychalski & Continental Insurance Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
[849]*849Appellant insurer is precluded from seeking a judicial stay of arbitration inasmuch as its application therefor was not properly served within the 20 days prescribed by statute (CPLR 7503, subd [c]). Additionally the payment by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of the full $10,000 under the standard New York uninsured motorist indorsement, while relevant to the consideration and determination of the claims of the parties by the arbitrator, is unrelated to appellant’s commitment to submit such claims to arbitration. Finally, we think it impermissible for us to express any view as to "whether the claim with respect to which arbitration is sought is tenable, or otherwise pass upon the merits of the dispute”. (CPLR 7501.)
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
382 N.E.2d 765, 45 N.Y.2d 847, 410 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-richard-spychalski-continental-insurance-ny-1978.