In re the Arbitration between New York City Transit Authority & Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between New York City Transit Authority & Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n

128 A.D.2d 616, 513 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44307

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 A.D.2d 616 (In re the Arbitration between New York City Transit Authority & Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between New York City Transit Authority & Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n, 128 A.D.2d 616, 513 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitrator’s award dated January 2, 1985, and clarified March 5, 1985, which after a hearing, provided, inter alia, that the number of approvals by the petitioner for the donation of blood by police officers, pursuant to section 5 of article XIV of the collective bargaining agreement effective July 1, 1982, shall be restored to the level which existed in calendar year 1982, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated September 18, 1985, which denied the petitioner’s application to vacate the award and granted the respondents’ cross motion to confirm the award.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It cannot be said that the arbitrator gave a completely irrational construction to the provision in dispute and, in effect, exceeded his authority by making a new contract for the parties (see, Matter of Board of Educ. v Dover-Wingdale Teachers’ Assn., 95 AD2d 497, affd 61 NY2d 913; Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 383). Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitrator’s award dated January 2, 1985, and clarified March 5, 1985, which after a hearing, provided, inter alia, that the number of approvals by the petitioner for the donation of blood by police officers, pursuant to section 5 of article XIV of the collective bargaining agreement effective July 1, 1982, shall be restored to the level which existed in calendar year 1982, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated September 18, 1985, which denied the petitioner’s application to vacate the award and granted the respondents’ cross motion to confirm the award.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It cannot be said that the arbitrator gave a completely irrational construction to the provision in dispute and, in effect, exceeded his authority by making a new contract for the parties (see, Matter of Board of Educ. v Dover-Wingdale Teachers’ Assn., 95 AD2d 497, affd 61 NY2d 913; Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 383). Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 616, 513 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-new-york-city-transit-authority-patrolmens-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack