In re the Arbitration between Liberty Mutual Insurance & Allstate Insurance

234 A.D.2d 901, 651 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13618
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 901 (In re the Arbitration between Liberty Mutual Insurance & Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Liberty Mutual Insurance & Allstate Insurance, 234 A.D.2d 901, 651 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition denied and award confirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to vacate the arbitration award. Petitioner sought vacatur of the award on the ground that arbitration was not available under Insurance Law § 5105 (a) because neither of the vehicles involved in the collision weighed more than 6,500 pounds. By failing to apply for a stay of arbitration before arbitration, petitioner waived the contention that the claim is not arbitrable under Insurance Law § 5105 (see, Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 309; Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578, 583; Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Cebularz, 191 AD2d 690), and may not later seek to vacate the arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his or her power (see, Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., supra, at 583). Furthermore, the Personal Injury Protection (No-Fault) Arbitration Agreement between the parties provides that, if a respondent company does not assert in its answer an affirmative defense that the arbitrator did not have jurisdiction to proceed with a hearing, that affirmative defense is waived. Thus, pursuant to the agreement, petitioner waived the contention that the claim is not arbitrable under Insurance Law § 5105. Consequently, we deny the petition to vacate the arbitration award and confirm the award. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mor due, J.— Arbitration.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Wesley and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Infinity Indem. Ins. Co. v. Hereford Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 3177 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
PHILADELPHIA INSURANCE COMPANY, MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
In re the Arbitration between Philadelphia Insurance & Utica National Insurance Group
97 A.D.3d 1153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Progressive Casualty Insurance v. New York State Insurance Fund
47 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Utica Mutual Insurance v. Inc. Village of Floral Park
262 A.D.2d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re the Arbitration between Travelers Property Casualty Insurance & Allstate Insurance
248 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Arbitration between County of Onondaga & Civil Service Employees Ass'n
248 A.D.2d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D.2d 901, 651 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-liberty-mutual-insurance-allstate-insurance-nyappdiv-1996.