In re the Arbitration between County of Onondaga & Civil Service Employees Ass'n
This text of 248 A.D.2d 1026 (In re the Arbitration between County of Onondaga & Civil Service Employees Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: By failing to apply for a stay of arbitration and by participating in the arbitration, petitioner waived its contention that the claim is not arbitrable (see, Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578, 583; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Allstate Ins. Co.], 234 AD2d 901; Matter of Arner v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 233 AD2d 321). Petitioner therefore may not seek to vacate the arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded her powers because she lacked the power to resolve the question submitted (see, Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., supra, at 583). We reject petitioner’s further contention that the arbitrator otherwise exceeded her authority or that the award was contrary to public policy. (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Tormey, III, J. — Arbitration.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 1026, 670 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-county-of-onondaga-civil-service-employees-nyappdiv-1998.